The Executive Hiring Mistake Biotech Leaders Keep Making
The hiring question that could change everything: Are you defaulting to familiarity—or choosing for the future?
In biotech, executive hiring is often treated like risk management.
Stick with who you know. Stay in the comfort zone.
But here’s the mistake:
When you default to your circle, you may be closing the door on your company’s future.
Familiar Isn’t Safer. It’s Just Smaller.
Every early hire in a biotech company shapes more than function—they shape culture, execution, and trajectory.
But when boards or founders face a critical hire, the default questions often sound like this:
Who do we know who could do this job?
Who’s done it before?
Who has worked with us in the past?
On the surface, it feels like a smart approach. Familiarity feels like a safeguard.
But in reality, it’s a shortcut—and it can cost you dearly.
Hiring only from your small circle limits innovation, narrows your perspective, and may keep you from finding the leader your company actually needs. In a field defined by breakthrough science, hiring based on the past can quietly hold you back.
The best executive hires aren’t just those who can do the job today.
They’re the ones who will lead your company into what’s next.
And often, they’re not already in your network.
A Better Search: What It Looks Like
When I was hiring for a key executive role at a biotech startup, we knew the stakes were high. This hire could meaningfully shift our odds of success—and if we got it wrong, we’d feel it fast.
We decided early: our candidate slate had to go beyond who we already knew.
That’s when we partnered with a boutique executive search firm that truly understood our space—not just biotech broadly, but our specific science and leadership context. From the first conversation, it was clear: this wasn’t a transactional recruiter. This was a thought partner.
They didn’t just bring us resumes. They:
Challenged our assumptions and helped us refine what success actually looked like
Introduced candidates we hadn’t considered—but who turned out to be exactly what we needed
Turned reference checks into deep conversations that helped us understand how to support the new hire from day one
I don’t usually trust recruiters to handle reference calls. But bandwidth was tight, so I let them take a few.
What came back wasn’t just confirmation—it was insight.
They dug deep, went beyond the obvious contacts, and surfaced real intel.
By the end of the process, we knew our top candidate like they had been in our network all along.
How to Break Out of the Hiring Comfort Zone
If you're ready to look beyond the familiar—without taking on unnecessary risk—start here:
Making a High-Stakes Hire Right Now?
Use my custom Hiring Decision GPT to walk through your real decision in real time. It helps you clarify criteria, weight trade-offs, and build a defensible case.
Email me at angela@justicegroupadvisors.com with "Hiring GPT Access"
No confidential data required. Free for now.
1. Define What Really Matters
Before you anchor to a name, anchor to an outcome.
What does success look like in the next 12–18 months?
What specific skills, experiences, and leadership traits are non-negotiable?
Where can you flex?
Once you've expanded your candidate slate beyond the familiar, you need a structured way to evaluate them. That's where the Decision Matrix comes in—it helps you make talent trade-offs visible and defensible, so you're choosing based on what the organization needs, not who feels most comfortable.
Read: Why Talent Decisions in Biopharma Require More Than Gut Instinct
2. Use a Structured Decision-Making Process
Great hiring isn’t a gut call—it’s a disciplined process.
Set your decision criteria before you meet candidates—and use a framework like the Decision Matrix to make those criteria explicit and weighted
Assess leadership, execution, and long-term potential—not just credentials
Treat references as a data source, not a checkbox
The Decision Matrix framework helps you surface hidden assumptions, weight competing priorities, and build a defensible case for your choice. Learn how to apply it here: Why Talent Decisions in Biopharma Require More Than Gut Instinct.
3. Partner with the Right Recruiter
The best recruiters aren’t headhunters. They’re advisors.
They challenge your assumptions
They introduce candidates you wouldn’t find on your own
They pressure-test for fit—now and later
They give you the confidence to hire boldly
Bottom Line
The most important decisions you’ll make as a biotech leader aren’t about science.
They’re about people.
And the difference between a good hire and the right one?
It’s the difference between playing it safe—and building something that lasts.
So next time you’re hiring, don’t just ask:
“Who do we know?”
Ask:
“Who can take us where we need to go?”
Once you've got the right candidates in the room? Use a structured framework to evaluate them—not your gut. That's how you turn bold hiring into strategic hiring.
And that’s how real leadership bets get made.
P.S. Getting the hire right is step one. But here's what most companies miss: even your best executive hires will eventually leave. And how they exit matters just as much as how they arrived.
When a key leader leaves badly—burning bridges, creating uncertainty, damaging relationships—it doesn't just hurt them. It destabilizes your team and makes your next executive hire harder.
That's why I built Leave Well™: the strategic exit system that protects the reputation and relationships your leaders have spent years building. Learn more about Leave Well
Related Reads
You've gathered the data. Rehearsed the rationale. But fifteen minutes into the conversation, you're defending details that don't matter. Here's why difficult feedback conversations collapse—and the shift that changes everything.